Next: The Cayley-Klein model of
Up: The Projective Geometry of
Previous: Action of on the
In this section, we undertake the study of nondegenerate conics on
. Our aim is to relate the algebraic approach of the previous
sections to the classical synthetic approach of Chasles and Steiner.
The first important result about conics is that, up to projective
transformations, they are all the same. More precisely:
Exercise 4.1 (05)
Show that if

and

are two quadratic forms in

that
define two nondegenerate (and non-empty) conics in

, then
there exists an invertible linear transformation

such that either

or

. Conclude that all nondegenerate
conics on

are projectively equivalent.
Remark.
From now on all conics will be nondegenerate and nonempty.
As a consequence of the previous exercise, we have that it is possible to
define the cross-ratio of four points on a conic.
Exercise 4.2 (10)
Let

be four distinct points on a conic

. If

and

are any two points on

that are different from the
previous four points, the cross-ratios
![$ [EA,EB,EC,ED]$](img106.gif)
and
![$ [FA,FB,FC,FD]$](img107.gif)
are equal (Fig. 2). Use this to define the cross-ratio of
four points on a conic. Hint: assume

is a circle and then
use the conclusion of exercise
4.1 to reduce the problem
to this case.
Figure 2.
By duality, we may also define the cross-ratio of four lines tangent to
a conic: if
, and
are four lines tangent to a conic, take a fifth
line
tangent to the same conic and define the cross-ratio
as
the cross-ratio of the points
, and
on the line
(Fig. 3)
Figure 3.
Exercise 4.3
If

and

are two points on a conic

, we may set up a
correspondence between the pencil of lines passing through

and the
pencil of lines passing through

: if

is a line
passing through

, then it either intersects the conic at some other
point

or it is the tangent line to

passing through

.
In the first case, we associate to

the line

; in the second,
the line

(Fig. 4). Use exercise
4.2 to show that
this correspondence preserves cross-ratios and is, therefore, a projective
transformation between the pencils.
Figure 4.
Conversely, we have the following beautiful construction of conics due
to Steiner.
Theorem 4.1
Let

be a projective transformation between the pencil of lines passing
through a point

and the pencil of lines passing through a point

.
The set
is a conic.
Exercise 4.4 (10)
Show that if the projective transformation is a perspectivity, then
the construction yields a degenerate conic.
If
is a projective transformation taking
to
and
to
, then the pencils of lines passing through
and
are taken to the pencils of vertical and horizontal lines on the plane
(Fig. 5). Furthermore,
is transformed into the graph of a function
from the
-axis to the
-axis.
Figure 5.
Exercise 4.5 (10)
Use that

is a projective transformation between
the pencil of lines passing through
![$ [0:1:0]$](img127.gif)
(the pencil of vertical
lines on the plane

) to the pencil of lines passing through
![$ [1:0:0]$](img128.gif)
(the pencil of horizontal lines) to show that

is of the
form

. Conclude that

is a
hyperbola on the plane

and use this to prove theorem
4.1.
Exercise 4.6 (10)
State the dual of Steiner's theorem. This is Chasles' theorem.
Using Steiner's theorem, we can easily prove that five points determine
a conic. Indeed, let
, and
be five points on the plane.
If three or more of these points are collinear then it is easy to
see that they all lie on a degenerate conic. Assume now that
no three of these points are collinear. Remark that there is
a unique projective transformation
between the pencil of lines
passing through
and the pencil of lines passing through
such that
,
, and
(Fig. 6). By Steiner's theorem
defines a conic that passes through all five points.
Figure 6.
By duality, we have that given five lines, there is a unique conic that
is tangent to all of them.
Since five points determine a conic, it is clear that six points are
not on the same conic unless they satisfy some special condition. This
condition, discovered by the mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal,
is one of the earliest and prettiest results on projective geometry.
Theorem 4.2 (Pascal's theorem)
The six vertices of a hexagon lie on a conic if and only if the three
points obtained by intersecting the three pairs of opposite sides are
collinear (Fig. 7).
Figure 7.
The following two exercises prove that if the six vertices
of a hexagon lie on a conic the three points obtained by intersecting the
three pairs of opposite sides are collinear. The proof of the converse
uses the same ideas and is left for the reader as a less structured
exercise.
Consider the transformation
that takes the points of the line
to
the points of the line
that is defined by the following construction:
- If
, draw the line
.
- Let
be the second point of intersection of the line
and
the conic.
- Draw the line
.
- Let
be the point
.
Exercise 4.7 (05)
Prove that the transformation

is a perspectivity.
Exercise 4.8 (05)
Show that

and that the center of perspective is

. Verify
that this proves the first part of Pascal's theorem.
Exercise 4.9 (10)
Show that if the three points obtained by intersecting the
three pairs of opposite sides of a hexagon are collinear, its vertices
lie on a conic.
The dual of Pascal's theorem is the following result originally dicovered
by Brianchon.
Theorem 4.3 (Brianchon's theorem)
The six sides of a hexagon are tangent to a conic if and only if the
three lines obtained by joining the three pairs of opposite vertices are
concurrent (Fig. 8).
Figure 8.
Next: The Cayley-Klein model of
Up: The Projective Geometry of
Previous: Action of on the
Juan Carlos Alvarez
2001-01-30