Next: Bibliography
Up: Geometry of the Complex
Previous: The complex projective line
From the algebraic viewpoint, there is little difference
between the description of the action of the complex projective
group on complex projective space and the description of the
action of the real projective group on real projective space.
Exercise 2.1 (00)
Show that the action of

on

defined by
![$ (A,[v]) \mapsto [Av]$](img37.gif)
is transitive. Show that a matrix

fixes all points of

if and only if
it is a multiple of the indentity.
Definition 2.1
The
projective group

, is the quotient of

by the equivalence relation: two matrices are equivalent
if they are multiple of each other.
Exercise 2.2 (00)
Use exercise
2.1 to define a transitive action of

on

. Show that if an element of the projective
group fixes all points in projective space, then it is the identity.
Exercise 2.3
Identify

with

plus the point at infinity and let
be an invertible (complex) matrix. Show that the effect of the
action of

on a complex number

equals

.
Transformations of the form
are commonly called Moebius transformations or linear fractional
transformations.
As a trivial consequence of this exercise we have:
Theorem 2.1 (First fundamental theorem)
If

and

are two triples of distinct points on
the complex projective line, there exits a unique projective transformation
that sends

to

,

to

and

to

.
Definition 2.2
Let

be a quadruple of points on the complex projective
line with

, and

different from each other,
and let

be the unique projective transformation taking

, and

respectively onto

, and

.
The
cross-ratio
![$ [p_{0},p_{1},p_{2},p_{3}]$](img65.gif)
is defined
as the point

.
Exercise 2.5 (00)
By indentifying the complex projective line with

,
verify that the cross-ratio of four complex numbers

can be written as:
Exercise 2.6 (00)
Show that if

is a projective transformation and

is a quadruple of points on the projective
line with

, and

different from each other,
then the cross-ratio
![$ [p_{0},p_{1},p_{2},p_{3}]$](img65.gif)
equals
![$ [T(p_{0}), T(p_{1}), T(p_{2}),T(p_{3})]$](img70.gif)
.
Theorem 2.2 (Second fundamental theorem)
A map from the complex projective line to itself is a projective
transformation if and only if it preserves cross-ratios.
Exercise 2.7 (00)
Prove theorem
2.2.
The preceding exercises -- exact copies of those of chapter 2 -- may
lull the reader into believing that the geometry of the complex projective line
is similar to that of the real projective line. We will presently
see that the former is infinitely richer and more beautiful. For one
thing, circles play a privileged role in complex projective geometry.
Remark.
From now on straight lines and circles will be simply called circles.
The intuitive idea is that a straight line is a circle of infinite
radius, or just the stereographic projection of a circle passing through
the north pole.
Exercise 2.8 (10)
Show that four points in

are on the same circle
if and only if their cross-ratio is a real number.
Exercise 2.9 (05)
Write the equation of the circle passing through points

and

.
An obvious consequence of exercise 2.8 is the following important
result.
Proposition 2.1
Moebius transformations send circles to circles.
Exercise 2.10 (10)
Show that given any two circles there is always a Moebius
transformation that takes one circle to the other.
To better understand Moebius transformations, let us consider three
particular cases. The first two cases are already familiar:
transformations of the form
are translations of the number
thought of as a vector
on the plane, transformations of the form
are dilations combined with rotations around the origin. The third
case, the inversion
, is more interesting.
Exercise 2.11 (15)
Take a point

on

and let

be the inverse image of

by stereographic projection
from the north pole of the unit sphere. Trace a line from

to
the south pole and mark the point where this line intersects

.
Show that this point is

.
The reader should always keep in mind that Moebius transformations are
just complex projective transformations when seen in the model that
identifies
with
plus a point at infinity. Changing from
this model to the sphere usually leads to new insights such as the one
in the exercise above. Another example is supplied by the following
exercise:
Exercise 2.12 (*15)
Show that a Moebius transformation

induces a rotation on the sphere if and only if

and

. In other words if and only if the matrix
is unitary. Hint: rotations fix a pair of antipodal points.
Since we can multiply all entries of
by the same nonzero
complex number without changing the transformation, we may assume that
the determinant of
equals 1. Use this to identify the group
as the double cover of the group of rotations
.
Exercise 2.13 (20)
Show that any Moebius transformation is the composition of translations,
dilations, rotations, and inversions.
Besides sending circles to circles, Moebius transformations have the
important property that they preserve angles and orientation. To
place this in the proper context, we will study all
transformations that satisfy this property.
Exercise 2.15 (20)
Show that the linear transformation from

to itself defined
by the invertible matrix
preserves angles and orientation if and only if

and

. In other
words,

represents multiplication by a nonzero complex number.
Hint:

preserves orientation if and only if its determinant is
positive.
Definition 2.3
A smooth map

from an open subset of

to

is said to
preserve angles if at each point

in its domain the differential
is a linear transformation that preserves angles. Likewise,

is said to
preserve orientation if its differential is a linear map that preserves
the orientation.
A smooth map from an open subset of
to
that preserves angles
and orientations is said to be conformal.
The previous exercise proves the following important result:
Theorem 2.3
Moebius transformations are conformal.
Using that Moebius transformations preserve angles, we can give a
simple proof that the stereographic projection preserves angles.
Exercise 2.18
Use exercise
1.7, the above theorem, and the fact that
rotations on the sphere can be represented by Moebius transformations to
show that stereographic projection preserves angles.
Next: Bibliography
Up: Geometry of the Complex
Previous: The complex projective line
Juan Carlos Alvarez
2000-10-27